Issue 4508 - Split screen in word processor would be a nice addition
Summary: Split screen in word processor would be a nice addition
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 19291
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: PC Windows ME
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
: 3986 5953 10052 10973 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-05-05 07:17 UTC by forficula
Modified: 2011-07-24 22:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description forficula 2002-05-05 07:17:10 UTC
As far as I can see it is not possible to split the screen so that two parts of 
the same document are worked on at the same time.  This would be a nice 
additional feature.

Also, I know there is a word count in the stats tab of properties.  However, 
this does not allow for counting the number of words in a section.  It would be 
a useful addition if this was added and available, with the general count 
option, in the Tools menu.  Preferred method would be one count words option 
that would count words in selected text, if text has been selected.
Comment 1 stefan.baltzer 2002-10-01 16:54:40 UTC
This is two enhancments in one issue. This won't work.
Please have a look at 

http://www.openoffice.org/bugs/bug_writing_guidelines.html

and decide wich one to drop (feel free to write a new issue for that one)
Thank you.
Comment 2 forficula 2002-10-28 22:08:43 UTC
This is an additional improvement, but I am not in a position to make 
the change.
Comment 3 stefan.baltzer 2002-11-25 13:31:58 UTC
About splitting the screen:
Via menu bar "Window-New window" opens another window of the current
file. -> Worksforme.

About the word count thingie:
Feel free to simply copy your description into a new issue.
Comment 4 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 09:53:39 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 5 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 09:53:40 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 6 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 10:29:20 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. 
Comment 7 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 10:29:27 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. 
Comment 8 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-12 19:12:31 UTC
*** Issue 5953 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-12 19:13:30 UTC
*** Issue 10973 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-12 19:22:10 UTC
*** Issue 19291 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-12 19:39:49 UTC
Changed summary for the RFE this Issue has been closed for.
As to the word count option on selected text see Issue 4568 for a workaround.
Comment 12 earthtone 2004-02-13 01:19:13 UTC
Please re-open this issue, as it is still unresolved. The person that closed 
it must not have understood what the request was. See Issue 19291 for a better 
explanation. I recommend marking this a duplicate of that one and leaving that 
one open, since this issue wasn't written according to the proper guidelines. 
Comment 13 stefan.baltzer 2004-02-13 17:42:29 UTC
Sba: I don't exactly like to repeat myself. It is possible: Via menu "Window -
New window" opens another window of the current document. -> set to Worksforme.

Please write another ENHANCEMENT issue if you think that clicking "Window - New
window" is too complicated to get another document view.

The open-close-ping pong makes the issues longer and longer and longer thus
eating more and more and more time when only READING the issues. Please leave
this one closed now.
Comment 14 hhielscher 2004-02-13 23:04:19 UTC
This bug is not about getting a second document view. Please read the subject,
it reads "Split screen ...". Please reopen the Bug or close the bug as fontfix.
Comment 15 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-14 10:32:43 UTC
*** Issue 3986 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-14 10:37:44 UTC
*** Issue 10052 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 17 rblackeagle 2004-02-14 13:55:56 UTC
pinkernell doesn't understand what we're asking for.  It is helpful to be able
to open the same document in another window, but we have to keep switching back
and forth to see what we want.  We can then shrink both windows so we have the
effect of a split screen, but that is a clumsy workaround.  What we're asking
for is a split screen so we see different parts of the same document or two
different documents on the same window -- not a different window.

I guess pinkernell has never seen a split screen.  There's considerable
difference between two windows and a single window split to show two different
views or even two documents in a single window.  The ease of use between the two
is enormously different.

I would love to see a split screen if pinkernell would simply reopen this as a
request for enhancement.  I'm going to try to reopen the issue, but if it
doesn't work, I'll file a new issue on this.
Comment 18 guido.pinkernell 2004-02-14 14:05:08 UTC
RBE, I am afraid you're addressing the wrong man here.

I am fully aware of the difference between split screen and having the same doc
opened in two windows. And I fully agree with you in that handling the latter is
clumsy.

What I have been doing is to close Issues which are obvious duplicates of this
so that the discussion on whether to implement such a feature or not can be
focussed within one Issue, which is this. The fact that this Issue was or is or
will be closed (not by me!) doesn't mean that discussion can't continue. In fact
it should.
Comment 19 rblackeagle 2004-02-14 14:19:17 UTC
Sorry if I misattributed or misunderstood the comments, pinkernell.

Which issue remains that would deal with the split screen request?
Comment 20 stefan.baltzer 2004-04-01 14:12:42 UTC
SBA: I reopened issue 4508 in order to close  THIS one as duplicate.
Reason: Clear and short description there, confusion and "too-much-junk-to-read"
in here. 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 19291 ***
Comment 21 stefan.baltzer 2004-04-01 14:50:02 UTC
SBA: Closed.
Comment 22 sietske 2009-07-14 10:34:25 UTC
I see that this issue is closed. What can I do to reopen it, so that I can vote?
The window --> new window alternative is quite unpractical if one's used to the
Word-principle of splitting the screen. 
Comment 23 yuehan 2010-09-03 21:50:37 UTC
Hi,
I think the "slide my window horizontally" feature is really a must have.
It's not only a "MS word-like" feature.
For people like me who edit procedures and test reports, with traceability
matrix, who want to check the content of a table at the end of the document with
the rest of the document, it's very easy with MS Word, but such a pain with oOo.
I read that this feature is claimed for years.
I really don't see the reason why not implementing it now.
oOo shall propose "at least" what other processors do, and achieve better.
Otherwise, what's the point?
Sincerly yours.
yuehan
Comment 24 erika 2011-07-24 22:31:26 UTC
I'm writing my masters thesis right now and my paper is about 130 pages long. I am writing the conclusion and need to reference other parts of my paper. This would be a lot easier if I could split the window. It seems like such a useful feature for documents of this length. I'm considering buying Word 2010 because it has a few useful features that OpenOffice lacks. Please add this feature to OO!!!